Our Founder, Craig Davis, will be speaking at the League of American Cyclists’ National Bike Summit in Washington D.C. on Tech Approaches to Safety Advocacy. He will discuss equipping cyclists to prevent collisions, analyze jurisdictional risk, and provide objective near miss data to traffic planners.
Our mission is to get cyclists to ride with cameras to give them the confidence that someone is always watching out for them and to submit incident reports of any egregious near misses to our free Incident Management System. Once cyclists have submitted their incident reports they can track, analyze, update and map their incidents. Their incident reports also allow all cyclists to search for repeat offenders before future collisions occur. Updating their incident reports as they move through the legal system allows us to analyze jurisdictional risk, i.e. are cycling safety cases processed in a timely manner or are they shunted off to low priority “overflow boxes” as in one of our current cases?
By analyzing our incident reports we can identify specific cycling safety legal barriers and work to remove them by setting legal precedents that all cyclists can leverage. The California Highway Patrol routinely refused cyclist incident reports by telling them they had to “On View” all incidents. We had to take the CHP all the way to the California Legislature before admitted they could use cyclist video evidence without having to witness every incident. This legal barrier is now removed since cyclists can point to our precedent if law enforcement tells them they have to “On View” all incidents. Incident reports were also routinely rejected when there wasn’t a collision and “therefore there was no victim” as stated to us by the second in command at the Alameda DA’s office. Our Glendale and Castro Valley precedents, where drivers have been charged for assault, using cyclist video evidence without a collision, remove that legal barrier for all cyclists.
Up to now the only data that traffic planners and government used for road design and safety planning are collisions. Collisions are severely underreported by up to 60% according Federal Highway Administration Research so collision data is incomplete at best. Our cyclist incident reports also generate objective near miss data supported by irrefutable video evidence. This can provide traffic planners much better data for cycling safety planning and road design. In fact the number one reason cyclists stop cycling are near misses and not collisions so planners should prioritize near misses as their most important data.
Cyclists from across California have repeatedly told us they do not feel law enforcement and our court system protect cyclist’s safety by enforcing our laws. We will be launching a Jurisdictional Risk survey so cyclists can share their experiences submitting egregious near miss incident reports to law enforcement. You can help design the survey by commenting below. Please also help us get the largest survey participation possible by sharing this post with every cyclist and cycling group you know as well as social media.
We created a large 24 * 36 poster that distills the ten law enforcement legal barriers our member cyclists have repeatedly faced and the three legal precedents we have secured that remove legal barriers to enforcing laws that can change driver’s behavior. The poster also documents law enforcement inconsistencies within the California Highway Patrol and between the CHP and local law enforcement even when they use the same District Attorney’s Office,
Wishing you safe cycling!